NUS Home Page
 
  inside this issue  
Spoon-Feeding
Spoon-Feeding in 'Do' Disciplines
Spoon-Feeding in Higher Education
Avoiding Spoon-Feeding: The Creative Teaching of Geography
Issues Discussed at the Q-&-A Session (at the 30 October 1999 CDTL Workshop)
 
 
  archives  
Plagiarism
 - Vol. 11 No. 2, May 2008
Independent Learning
 - Vol. 11 No. 1, Jan 2008
Undergraduate Research
 - Vol. 10 No. 1, Jan 2007
Engaging Students
 - Vol. 9 No. 2, Jul 2006
Learner-centred Teaching/Learning
 - Vol. 9 No. 1, Apr 2006
Annual Teaching Excellence Award
 - Vol. 10 No. 4, Sep 2007
 - Vol. 10 No. 3, Aug 2007
 - Vol. 9 No. 4, Sep 2006
 - Vol. 9 No. 3, Aug 2006
 - Vol. 8 No. 7, Oct 2005
 - Vol. 8 No. 6, Sep 2005
Lifelong Learning
 - Vol. 8 No. 5, Aug 2005
Balancing Theory and Practice
 - Vol. 8 No. 4, Jul 2005
Learning with Technology
 - Vol. 8 No. 3, May 2005
Reflective Learning
 - Vol. 8 No. 2, Mar 2005
Active Learning
 - Vol. 8 No. 1, Jan 2005
Balancing Teaching and Research
 - Vol. 7 No. 7, Aug 2004
Preparing for the First Lecture/Class
 - Vol. 7 No. 6, Jul 2004
Interactive Technology in Education
 - Vol. 7 No. 5, May 2004
Collaborative Learning
 - Vol. 7 No. 4, Apr 2004
Student Motivation/Teacher Motivation
 - Vol. 7 No. 3, Mar 2004
Discussion in the Classroom
 - Vol. 7 No. 2, Feb 2004
IT-supported Learning Strategies
 - Vol. 6 No. 9, Sep 2003
 - Vol. 6 No. 8, Aug 2003
Heterogeneous Student Body
 - Vol. 6 No. 7, Jul 2003
Postgraduate Supervision
 - Vol. 6 No. 6, Jun 2003
PDP-T Research Projects
 - Vol. 6 No. 5, May 2003
 - Vol. 6 No. 10, Oct 2003
 - Vol. 6 No. 11, Nov 2003
Cultivating Leaders
 - Vol. 6 No. 4, Apr 2003
NUS Outstanding Educator Award
 - Vol. 6 No. 2, Feb 2003
 - Vol. 7 No. 8, Sep 2004
 - Vol. 7 No. 9, Oct 2004
Constructivism
 - Vol. 6 No. 1, Jan 2003
Continuing Education
 - Vol. 5 No. 1, Mar 2002
Cross-disciplinary Teaching
 - Vol. 5 No. 2, Apr 2002
 - Vol. 9 No. 5. Oct 2006
Curriculum Design/Programme
 - Vol. 4 No. 6, Dec 2001
 - Vol. 3 No. 5, Oct 2000
 - Vol. 2 No. 5, Nov 1999
 - Vol. 1 No. 1, Apr 1998
Demonstration-Based Teaching
 - Vol. 4 No. 1, Feb 2001
Discipline and Counselling
 - Vol. 5 No. 5. Aug 2002
Emotional Intelligence
 - Vol. 2 No. 1, Mar 10, 1999
IT in Education
 - Vol. 10 No. 2, Apr 2007
 - Vol. 5 No. 3, May 2002
 - Vol. 4 No. 4, Oct 2001
 - Vol. 4 No. 3, Aug 2001
 - Vol. 3 No. 6, Nov 2000
 - Vol. 2 No. 2, Mar 15, 1999
 - Vol. 1 No. 2, Oct 1998
Large-Group Teaching
 - Vol. 4 No. 5, Nov 2001
Learning Styles
 - Vol. 5 No. 6, Sep 2002 
 - Vol. 5 No. 7, Oct 2002 
 - Vol. 7 No. 1, Jan 2004
Problem-Based Learning
 - Vol. 3 No. 3, Aug 2000
Small-Group Teaching
 - Vol. 2 No. 3, Apr 1999
Spoon Feeding
 - Vol. 3 No. 2, May 2000
Student Assessment
 - Vol. 2 No. 4, Aug 1999
 - Vol. 6 No. 3, Mar 2003
Student Management
 - Vol. 4 No. 2, Apr 2001
 - Vol. 3 No. 4, Sep 2000
Teaching Evaluation
 - Vol. 3 No. 1, Jan 2000
Thinking Skills
 - Vol. 5 No. 4, Jul 2002
   
 
 
Spoon Feeding  
   
May 2000, Vol. 3 No. 2
Spoon-Feeding in Higher Education
Associate Professor Rethy K. Chhem
Department of Diagnostic Radiology
Many educational situations can be defined as ‘spoon-feeding’ and it occurs most commonly in traditional lectures, small-group teaching sessions or seminars when the teacher deliberately provides the answers to students’ questions, etc. In short, ‘spoon-feeding’ is the situation where the teacher acts as a knowledge dispenser for passive students. The teaching here is centred on the teacher at the expense of the students’ learning process.

Why is Spoon-Feeding So Popular?

The lecture is not the only learning situation where spoon-feeding occurs, but it is the most common situation. That is why the advantages and limitations of the lecture will be described and discussed in this article.

  1. A lecture is short and needs little preparation, as the lecturer is the expert in the field in which he teaches. A ‘good’ lecture that has been prepared according to the traditional rules and delivered by a ‘good’ lecturer is still considered one of the best teaching methods.

  2. Once a lecture is delivered, there is no need for lengthy preparation for the following academic year, except the need for some updates.

  3. Lectures are economic and cost effective because one lecturer can deliver the course content to a large class, up to several hundreds of students.

  4. Students like the traditional lecture because there is no need for active effort. The only skills required are to be able to take notes, memorise the information to be regurgitated at the exam, and hopefully get the expected marks. Therefore, this process is also economic and cost effective for the students in terms of effort for information treatment.

  5. In most teaching situations, including lectures and other spoon-feeding conditions, giving the answer to students’ questions is good for the teacher’s ego, as he is perceived as the one who knows. In addition, the process is quick and costs the teacher very little in terms of time and commitment.

What are the Limitations of Spoon-Feeding?

  1. Spoon-feeding does not stimulate active participation from the students and only fosters rote learning.

  2. Spoon-feeding does not promote independent learning and creativity.

  3. Students lack initiative and problem-solving skills because they have not been trained to search for data by themselves.

Why is It So Difficult to Implement Active Learning Methods in Higher Education?

Lecturers have learned to teach by observing their own teachers, generation after generation, without formal training in educational methods, thus teaching the way they were taught. Therefore, most students have been exposed to the same widespread technique of spoon-feeding, and have become totally dependent on the lecturer to deliver information. Because of this tradition, both students and lecturers would resist any major changes in this habit.

To overcome this, seminars and workshops are necessary to make students and lecturers aware of alternative methods of active teaching and their respective advantages and limitations.

What are the Alternatives to Spoon-Feeding?

For the promoters of active learning, many teaching and learning methods can supplement traditional lectures or the tendency of lecturers to give the answers to students’ questions. The main paradigm shift here is to put responsibility for learning on the students themselves and to ask lecturers to train students to find the answers to their enquiries by themselves, using learning resources like the library, electronic databases, or the Internet. Therefore, the focus of teaching is to train students to assess their own educational needs, to search for relevant information, and to develop their own critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

Teaching methods that foster active learning, as opposed to spoon-feeding are many and include interactive lectures, small-group discussions, seminars, project work, problem-based learning, etc.

Back to Top

 

 
© 1998 - 2006 : Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning. All rights reserved