| |
|
|
 |
Plagiarism
- Vol. 11 No. 2, May 2008 |
 |
Independent Learning
- Vol. 11 No. 1, Jan 2008 |
 |
Undergraduate Research
- Vol. 10 No. 1, Jan 2007 |
 |
Engaging Students
- Vol. 9 No. 2, Jul 2006 |
 |
Learner-centred Teaching/Learning
- Vol. 9 No. 1, Apr 2006 |
 |
Annual Teaching Excellence Award
- Vol. 10 No. 4, Sep 2007
- Vol. 10 No. 3, Aug 2007
- Vol. 9 No. 4, Sep 2006
- Vol. 9 No. 3, Aug 2006
- Vol. 8 No. 7, Oct 2005
- Vol. 8 No. 6, Sep 2005 |
 |
Lifelong Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 5, Aug 2005 |
 |
Balancing Theory and Practice
- Vol. 8 No. 4, Jul 2005 |
 |
Learning with Technology
- Vol. 8 No. 3, May 2005 |
 |
Reflective Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 2, Mar 2005 |
 |
Active Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 1, Jan 2005 |
 |
Balancing Teaching and Research
- Vol. 7 No. 7, Aug 2004 |
|
|
 |
Preparing for the First Lecture/Class
- Vol. 7 No. 6, Jul 2004 |
|
|
 |
Interactive Technology in Education
- Vol. 7 No. 5, May 2004 |
|
|
 |
Collaborative Learning
- Vol. 7 No. 4, Apr 2004 |
|
|
 |
Student Motivation/Teacher Motivation
- Vol. 7 No. 3, Mar 2004 |
|
|
 |
Discussion in the Classroom
- Vol. 7 No. 2, Feb 2004 |
|
|
 |
IT-supported Learning Strategies
- Vol. 6 No. 9, Sep 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 8, Aug 2003 |
|
|
 |
Heterogeneous Student Body
- Vol. 6 No. 7, Jul 2003 |
|
|
 |
Postgraduate Supervision
- Vol. 6 No. 6, Jun 2003 |
|
|
 |
PDP-T Research Projects
- Vol. 6 No. 5, May 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 10, Oct 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 11, Nov 2003 |
|
|
 |
Cultivating Leaders
- Vol. 6 No. 4, Apr 2003 |
|
|
 |
NUS Outstanding Educator Award
- Vol. 6 No. 2, Feb 2003
- Vol. 7 No. 8, Sep 2004
- Vol. 7 No. 9, Oct 2004 |
|
|
 |
Constructivism
- Vol. 6 No. 1, Jan 2003 |
|
|
 |
Continuing Education
- Vol. 5 No. 1, Mar 2002 |
|
|
 |
Cross-disciplinary Teaching
- Vol. 5 No. 2, Apr 2002
- Vol. 9 No. 5. Oct 2006 |
|
|
 |
Curriculum Design/Programme
- Vol. 4 No. 6, Dec 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 5, Oct 2000
- Vol. 2 No. 5, Nov 1999
- Vol. 1 No. 1, Apr 1998 |
|
|
 |
Demonstration-Based Teaching
- Vol. 4 No. 1, Feb 2001 |
|
|
 |
Discipline and Counselling
- Vol. 5 No. 5. Aug 2002 |
|
|
 |
Emotional Intelligence
- Vol. 2 No. 1, Mar 10, 1999 |
|
|
 |
IT in Education
- Vol. 10 No. 2, Apr 2007 - Vol. 5 No. 3, May 2002
- Vol. 4 No. 4, Oct 2001
- Vol. 4 No. 3, Aug 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 6, Nov 2000
- Vol. 2 No. 2, Mar 15, 1999
- Vol. 1 No. 2, Oct 1998 |
|
|
 |
Large-Group Teaching
- Vol. 4 No. 5, Nov 2001 |
|
|
 |
Learning Styles
- Vol. 5 No. 6, Sep 2002
- Vol. 5 No. 7, Oct 2002
- Vol. 7 No. 1, Jan 2004 |
|
|
 |
Problem-Based Learning
- Vol. 3 No. 3, Aug 2000 |
|
|
 |
Small-Group Teaching
- Vol. 2 No. 3, Apr 1999 |
|
|
 |
Spoon Feeding
- Vol. 3 No. 2, May 2000 |
|
|
 |
Student Assessment
- Vol. 2 No. 4, Aug 1999
- Vol. 6 No. 3, Mar 2003 |
|
|
 |
Student Management
- Vol. 4 No. 2, Apr 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 4, Sep 2000 |
|
|
 |
Teaching Evaluation
- Vol. 3 No. 1, Jan 2000 |
|
|
 |
Thinking Skills
- Vol. 5 No. 4, Jul 2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Spoon
Feeding |
|
| |
|
|
May 2000, Vol. 3 No. 2 |
Print-Ready |
| Spoon-Feeding
in Higher Education |
Associate
Professor Rethy K. Chhem
Department of Diagnostic Radiology |
| Many
educational situations can be defined as ‘spoon-feeding’
and it occurs most commonly in traditional lectures, small-group
teaching sessions or seminars when the teacher deliberately
provides the answers to students’ questions, etc. In short,
‘spoon-feeding’ is the situation where the teacher
acts as a knowledge dispenser for passive students. The teaching
here is centred on the teacher at the expense of the students’
learning process.
Why is Spoon-Feeding So Popular?
The lecture is not the only learning situation where spoon-feeding
occurs, but it is the most common situation. That is why the
advantages and limitations of the lecture will be described
and discussed in this article.
- A lecture is short and needs little preparation, as the
lecturer is the expert in the field in which he teaches.
A ‘good’ lecture that has been prepared according
to the traditional rules and delivered by a ‘good’
lecturer is still considered one of the best teaching methods.
- Once a lecture is delivered, there is no need for lengthy
preparation for the following academic year, except the
need for some updates.
- Lectures are economic and cost effective because one
lecturer can deliver the course content to a large class,
up to several hundreds of students.
- Students like the traditional lecture because there is
no need for active effort. The only skills required are
to be able to take notes, memorise the information to be
regurgitated at the exam, and hopefully get the expected
marks. Therefore, this process is also economic and cost
effective for the students in terms of effort for information
treatment.
- In most teaching situations, including lectures and other
spoon-feeding conditions, giving the answer to students’
questions is good for the teacher’s ego, as he is
perceived as the one who knows. In addition, the process
is quick and costs the teacher very little in terms of time
and commitment.
What are the Limitations of Spoon-Feeding?
- Spoon-feeding does not stimulate active participation
from the students and only fosters rote learning.
- Spoon-feeding does not promote independent learning and
creativity.
- Students lack initiative and problem-solving skills because
they have not been trained to search for data by themselves.
Why is It So Difficult to Implement Active Learning
Methods in Higher Education?
Lecturers have learned to teach by observing their own teachers,
generation after generation, without formal training in educational
methods, thus teaching the way they were taught. Therefore,
most students have been exposed to the same widespread technique
of spoon-feeding, and have become totally dependent on the
lecturer to deliver information. Because of this tradition,
both students and lecturers would resist any major changes
in this habit.
To overcome this, seminars and workshops are necessary to
make students and lecturers aware of alternative methods of
active teaching and their respective advantages and limitations.
What are the Alternatives to Spoon-Feeding?
For the promoters of active learning, many teaching and
learning methods can supplement traditional lectures or the
tendency of lecturers to give the answers to students’
questions. The main paradigm shift here is to put responsibility
for learning on the students themselves and to ask lecturers
to train students to find the answers to their enquiries by
themselves, using learning resources like the library, electronic
databases, or the Internet. Therefore, the focus of teaching
is to train students to assess their own educational needs,
to search for relevant information, and to develop their own
critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Teaching methods that foster active learning, as opposed
to spoon-feeding are many and include interactive lectures,
small-group discussions, seminars, project work, problem-based
learning, etc.
|
|
|
Back to Top
|