NUS Home Page
 
  inside this issue  
e-Learning at Singapore Polytechnic: From Concept to Reality
Considerations for Web-Based Learning Design
Creating a Meaningful Learning Environment Using ICT
Understanding Strategies of Authoring Computer Courseware
Towards a Blended Design for e-Learning
 
 
  archives  
Plagiarism
 - Vol. 11 No. 2, May 2008
Independent Learning
 - Vol. 11 No. 1, Jan 2008
Undergraduate Research
 - Vol. 10 No. 1, Jan 2007
Engaging Students
 - Vol. 9 No. 2, Jul 2006
Learner-centred Teaching/Learning
 - Vol. 9 No. 1, Apr 2006
Annual Teaching Excellence Award
 - Vol. 10 No. 4, Sep 2007
 - Vol. 10 No. 3, Aug 2007
 - Vol. 9 No. 4, Sep 2006
 - Vol. 9 No. 3, Aug 2006
 - Vol. 8 No. 7, Oct 2005
 - Vol. 8 No. 6, Sep 2005
Lifelong Learning
 - Vol. 8 No. 5, Aug 2005
Balancing Theory and Practice
 - Vol. 8 No. 4, Jul 2005
Learning with Technology
 - Vol. 8 No. 3, May 2005
Reflective Learning
 - Vol. 8 No. 2, Mar 2005
Active Learning
 - Vol. 8 No. 1, Jan 2005
Balancing Teaching and Research
 - Vol. 7 No. 7, Aug 2004
Preparing for the First Lecture/Class
 - Vol. 7 No. 6, Jul 2004
Interactive Technology in Education
 - Vol. 7 No. 5, May 2004
Collaborative Learning
 - Vol. 7 No. 4, Apr 2004
Student Motivation/Teacher Motivation
 - Vol. 7 No. 3, Mar 2004
Discussion in the Classroom
 - Vol. 7 No. 2, Feb 2004
IT-supported Learning Strategies
 - Vol. 6 No. 9, Sep 2003
 - Vol. 6 No. 8, Aug 2003
Heterogeneous Student Body
 - Vol. 6 No. 7, Jul 2003
Postgraduate Supervision
 - Vol. 6 No. 6, Jun 2003
PDP-T Research Projects
 - Vol. 6 No. 5, May 2003
 - Vol. 6 No. 10, Oct 2003
 - Vol. 6 No. 11, Nov 2003
Cultivating Leaders
 - Vol. 6 No. 4, Apr 2003
NUS Outstanding Educator Award
 - Vol. 6 No. 2, Feb 2003
 - Vol. 7 No. 8, Sep 2004
 - Vol. 7 No. 9, Oct 2004
Constructivism
 - Vol. 6 No. 1, Jan 2003
Continuing Education
 - Vol. 5 No. 1, Mar 2002
Cross-disciplinary Teaching
 - Vol. 5 No. 2, Apr 2002
 - Vol. 9 No. 5. Oct 2006
Curriculum Design/Programme
 - Vol. 4 No. 6, Dec 2001
 - Vol. 3 No. 5, Oct 2000
 - Vol. 2 No. 5, Nov 1999
 - Vol. 1 No. 1, Apr 1998
Demonstration-Based Teaching
 - Vol. 4 No. 1, Feb 2001
Discipline and Counselling
 - Vol. 5 No. 5. Aug 2002
Emotional Intelligence
 - Vol. 2 No. 1, Mar 10, 1999
IT in Education
 - Vol. 10 No. 2, Apr 2007
 - Vol. 5 No. 3, May 2002
 - Vol. 4 No. 4, Oct 2001
 - Vol. 4 No. 3, Aug 2001
 - Vol. 3 No. 6, Nov 2000
 - Vol. 2 No. 2, Mar 15, 1999
 - Vol. 1 No. 2, Oct 1998
Large-Group Teaching
 - Vol. 4 No. 5, Nov 2001
Learning Styles
 - Vol. 5 No. 6, Sep 2002 
 - Vol. 5 No. 7, Oct 2002 
 - Vol. 7 No. 1, Jan 2004
Problem-Based Learning
 - Vol. 3 No. 3, Aug 2000
Small-Group Teaching
 - Vol. 2 No. 3, Apr 1999
Spoon Feeding
 - Vol. 3 No. 2, May 2000
Student Assessment
 - Vol. 2 No. 4, Aug 1999
 - Vol. 6 No. 3, Mar 2003
Student Management
 - Vol. 4 No. 2, Apr 2001
 - Vol. 3 No. 4, Sep 2000
Teaching Evaluation
 - Vol. 3 No. 1, Jan 2000
Thinking Skills
 - Vol. 5 No. 4, Jul 2002
   
 
 
Instructional Systems Design  
   
May 2002, Vol. 5 No. 3
Considerations for Web-Based Learning Design
Mr J. A. Gilles Doiron
Principal Educational Technologist, CDTL

In universities around the world, teaching staff are being encouraged to create online learning materials. Not just making lecture notes available to students, lecturers are urged to make better use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for teaching and learning by creating online activities for their students. However, most have little experience in designing Web-Based Learning (WBL) to enhance their curriculum, although some may have ad hoc knowledge of the Instructional Systems Design (ISD) process. The following are points to consider when reflecting on how to build a WBL activity for your students:

  1. Establish a formal development process that is best suited for your course. Focus on meeting the needs of your students and plan, design, test, build, deliver, observe, and refine accordingly. Quality outcomes depend on adhering to this process.

  2. Think of the learning objectives when choosing media to support learning. Never use technology for the sake of using technology. For example, should you use video clips? Ask yourself whether motion or time-based sequencing is an essential element of the point you are teaching. If not, then forgo using video. Your students will be more impressed with rational choices of media types than in being wowed by irrelevant bells and whistles. Also remember that more and more students are accessing course materials from home and that, for most, bandwidth is still an issue. If your learning objective requires that you use video, advise your students that they should access this WBL on campus through the Intranet.

  3. Provide ample opportunity for the user to interact with the information. Appropriate instructional design provides for meaningful interactions between the student and the concepts to learn.

    If you are not familiar with web programming and web authoring tools, talk to specialists from your faculty Centre for Information Technology Application (CITA) or from the Centre for Instructional Technology (CIT).

    The use of HTML, Java, and Shockwave offers ways to add interactive design elements that engage the learner. Buttons, hot spots, controls, movable objects, and data entry fields: each has its use in instructional design. Keep in mind that your design goal should be to encourage intellectual interaction with course content; some interactions could be used to test if students have understood relationships and concepts, while others could be used to activate deeper levels of learning, gradually adding complexity to the learning activity.

  4. Design WBL, where possible, that adapts to the students’ abilities and intelligently responds to the students’ input. Design your WBL to detect whether a student is having difficulty with a concept or a task, and offer remediation through extra information presentation and reinforcement, or suggest alternative resources (e.g. other courses, publications, hyperlinked information). Be an effective communicator. Provide meaningful feedback to student input; reinforce a concept and clarify common misunderstandings. Respect the learner. Avoid any content or feedback that is instructionally insignificant, annoying, or degrading.

  5. Keep in mind that students learn through a variety of styles. Visual learners need lots of graphic illustrations to understand concepts and relationships. Verbal learners use text and narration to accomplish the same end. Reflect on the type of presentation features you should include in your WBL and whether learners with differing learning styles will benefit equally.

  6. Reject and abandon the traditional linear approach to designing instruction. In WBL, the student should be the one to decide on which direction to take in their personal sequence of learning. While it is perfectly acceptable to suggest a path through a course, dictating that students follow a predetermined path through linear design is not recommended. Good WBL design allows the students to customise their learning path: to start where they want, to stop and return to where they left off, and to access items from various pathways.

  7. Ask some students to test your designs. Follow the WBL developers’ maxim: test early and test often. This applies to both the instructional design and the user interface, including icons, buttons, and navigational features. Also remember that your personal views on screen layout and user friendliness may conflict with those of the target audience. Seek the advice of multimedia producers, educational technologists and experienced instructional designers: call on CDTL, CIT and your CITA staff.

Back to Top

 

 
© 1998 - 2006 : Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning. All rights reserved