|
Introduction
This article briefly describes the measures adopted for
graduate research and supervision in the School of Design
and Environment (SDE) since June 2000. Among others, the measures
serve to achieve the following objectives:
- Ensure that the best interests of research students are
met,
- Ensure that the core competencies of the departments
are built up over time, and
- Ensure that faculty members are given the opportunities
to develop their capabilities in graduate research supervision.
Research Topics
Research topics in SDE range widely from humanities and
social sciences to science and engineering. Although applicants
may propose their areas of research, measures are taken to
ensure that the areas put forward match those of their potential
supervisors’ so that our research students will in turn
contribute towards the strengthening of the strategic focus
and core competencies of the departments. All applicants are
expected to be full-time candidates.
Broadening Exposure
SDE research students are also given maximum exposure to
cutting-edge research in their areas of research, both locally
and overseas. For example, research students in the joint
PhD programme between the NUS Department of Building and the
Technical University of Denmark are exposed to different climatic
conditions in indoor environment and energy research.
Joint Supervision
Senior faculty members supervise PhD students and mentor
junior faculty members (assistant professors who serve as
members of the thesis committee). The arrangement safeguards
the interests of the research students and provides opportunities
for the assistant professors to learn about graduate research
supervision from senior faculty members at the same time.
Like many other faculties and schools, SDE also faces intense
international competition for good students from top overseas
universities such as those in China. The school recognises
that top Chinese students will come to NUS if their professors
strongly encourage them to do so. Thus, SDE hopes to overcome
the competition by implementing joint supervision between
NUS professors and their Chinese counterparts who have recommended
their own Chinese students to come to NUS. The Chinese professors
effectively become a stakeholder in this arrangement. Besides,
the possibility of joint publications in English journals
(with their NUS PhD students and professors), which they would
otherwise not publish, could be additional motivation.
Conference Presentation
SDE encourages and provides financial support for research
students to present joint papers with their supervisors at
established international conferences. Supervisors are advised
to attend the conferences where their research students are
making presentations to support them.
Research Seminars
Such seminars are regular features of the Departments of
Architecture, Building and Real Estate where research students
are expected to present their research design, methodologies
and findings as well as share their experiences. Presentations
are scheduled during the initial stages of research, after
the PhD qualifying examination, as well as after the successful
oral defence of the thesis. Such seminars are also good rehearsal
platforms for the students before they make their formal presentations
at international conferences.
Industry Sponsorship
Being a professional school, many of the topics undertaken
by research students in SDE are inevitably related to practice-related
problems confronting the industry. The school recognises that
a greater synergy can be garnered through a closer alliance
with the industry. From regular dialogues with major property
developers and manufacturers of building products, the school
has identified practice-related problems that the industry
would like to solve. In such cases, SDE encourages the industry
to provide funding for research scholarships and research
projects that would specifically address the identified problems.
Such strategic alliances help the school to source for more
external funds to support more research students and help
the industrial sponsors resolve their company-based research
problems at the same time.
The Future
With entrepreneurial economic activities becoming increasingly
more important in the new knowledge economy, strategic alliances
with industries and companies will continue to gain increasing
significance. It may be timely to explore how the traditional
PhD route can be restructured to achieve the same scholarship
rigour and yet, make more significant contributions to companies
and industries concurrently.
It is believed that the philosophy and principles behind
the Engineering Doctorate (EngD) introduced recently in the
UK can be examined further in the restructuring of our PhD
route. In essence, the objectives of the EngD are:
- Development of innovative thinking, while tackling real
industrial problems, and
- Continual broadening, by gaining and applying new knowledge
from a modular taught programme.
Depending on the nature of the research project, EngD candidates
are expected to spend between 70–80% of their time at
the premises of their collaborating companies. Training courses
are tailored individually to their needs in order to develop
a wider range of competencies in engineering business management
as well as specialist technical subjects. Candidates are required
to satisfy the requirements of the taught modules. Such candidates
are expected to demonstrate innovation in the application
of knowledge to the engineering business and make a significant
contribution to the performance of the collaborating companies
who sponsor them. The EngD is assessed by means of a mini-thesis
as well as a portfolio that covers the key requirements for
a Management Development module. In addition, the portfolio
is built up over the period of the candidature under joint
supervision by an academic supervisor as well as an industrial
supervisor. It is therefore essential that candidates (or
company employees as the case may be) ensure that their daily
day work and EngD project work have as much similarities as
possible.
Ideas highlighted in this article were collated from
members of the School Management Committee over the past two
years. The pointers in the last section were sourced from
the Centre for Innovative Construction Engineering.
|