| |
|
|
 |
Plagiarism
- Vol. 11 No. 2, May 2008 |
 |
Independent Learning
- Vol. 11 No. 1, Jan 2008 |
 |
Undergraduate Research
- Vol. 10 No. 1, Jan 2007 |
 |
Engaging Students
- Vol. 9 No. 2, Jul 2006 |
 |
Learner-centred Teaching/Learning
- Vol. 9 No. 1, Apr 2006 |
 |
Annual Teaching Excellence Award
- Vol. 10 No. 4, Sep 2007
- Vol. 10 No. 3, Aug 2007
- Vol. 9 No. 4, Sep 2006
- Vol. 9 No. 3, Aug 2006
- Vol. 8 No. 7, Oct 2005
- Vol. 8 No. 6, Sep 2005 |
 |
Lifelong Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 5, Aug 2005 |
 |
Balancing Theory and Practice
- Vol. 8 No. 4, Jul 2005 |
 |
Learning with Technology
- Vol. 8 No. 3, May 2005 |
 |
Reflective Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 2, Mar 2005 |
 |
Active Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 1, Jan 2005 |
 |
Balancing Teaching and Research
- Vol. 7 No. 7, Aug 2004 |
|
|
 |
Preparing for the First Lecture/Class
- Vol. 7 No. 6, Jul 2004 |
|
|
 |
Interactive Technology in Education
- Vol. 7 No. 5, May 2004 |
|
|
 |
Collaborative Learning
- Vol. 7 No. 4, Apr 2004 |
|
|
 |
Student Motivation/Teacher Motivation
- Vol. 7 No. 3, Mar 2004 |
|
|
 |
Discussion in the Classroom
- Vol. 7 No. 2, Feb 2004 |
|
|
 |
IT-supported Learning Strategies
- Vol. 6 No. 9, Sep 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 8, Aug 2003 |
|
|
 |
Heterogeneous Student Body
- Vol. 6 No. 7, Jul 2003 |
|
|
 |
Postgraduate Supervision
- Vol. 6 No. 6, Jun 2003 |
|
|
 |
PDP-T Research Projects
- Vol. 6 No. 5, May 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 10, Oct 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 11, Nov 2003 |
|
|
 |
Cultivating Leaders
- Vol. 6 No. 4, Apr 2003 |
|
|
 |
NUS Outstanding Educator Award
- Vol. 6 No. 2, Feb 2003
- Vol. 7 No. 8, Sep 2004
- Vol. 7 No. 9, Oct 2004 |
|
|
 |
Constructivism
- Vol. 6 No. 1, Jan 2003 |
|
|
 |
Continuing Education
- Vol. 5 No. 1, Mar 2002 |
|
|
 |
Cross-disciplinary Teaching
- Vol. 5 No. 2, Apr 2002
- Vol. 9 No. 5. Oct 2006 |
|
|
 |
Curriculum Design/Programme
- Vol. 4 No. 6, Dec 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 5, Oct 2000
- Vol. 2 No. 5, Nov 1999
- Vol. 1 No. 1, Apr 1998 |
|
|
 |
Demonstration-Based Teaching
- Vol. 4 No. 1, Feb 2001 |
|
|
 |
Discipline and Counselling
- Vol. 5 No. 5. Aug 2002 |
|
|
 |
Emotional Intelligence
- Vol. 2 No. 1, Mar 10, 1999 |
|
|
 |
IT in Education
- Vol. 10 No. 2, Apr 2007 - Vol. 5 No. 3, May 2002
- Vol. 4 No. 4, Oct 2001
- Vol. 4 No. 3, Aug 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 6, Nov 2000
- Vol. 2 No. 2, Mar 15, 1999
- Vol. 1 No. 2, Oct 1998 |
|
|
 |
Large-Group Teaching
- Vol. 4 No. 5, Nov 2001 |
|
|
 |
Learning Styles
- Vol. 5 No. 6, Sep 2002
- Vol. 5 No. 7, Oct 2002
- Vol. 7 No. 1, Jan 2004 |
|
|
 |
Problem-Based Learning
- Vol. 3 No. 3, Aug 2000 |
|
|
 |
Small-Group Teaching
- Vol. 2 No. 3, Apr 1999 |
|
|
 |
Spoon Feeding
- Vol. 3 No. 2, May 2000 |
|
|
 |
Student Assessment
- Vol. 2 No. 4, Aug 1999
- Vol. 6 No. 3, Mar 2003 |
|
|
 |
Student Management
- Vol. 4 No. 2, Apr 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 4, Sep 2000 |
|
|
 |
Teaching Evaluation
- Vol. 3 No. 1, Jan 2000 |
|
|
 |
Thinking Skills
- Vol. 5 No. 4, Jul 2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Annual
Teaching Excellence Award (ATEA) |
|
| |
|
| September 2006, Vol. 9, No. 4 |
Print-Ready |
| My Approach to
Educating Students |
Dr R. Balasubramanian
Division of Environmental Science and Engineering |
|
When I began my academic career at NUS, I had
neither teaching experience nor any formal training
in teaching methods under my belt. Naturally, my
teaching methods were shaped by past interactions
with my teachers and by my own preferred learning
style. My favourite teachers were those who
stimulated my interest in the subject by delivering
the material in a clear and organised way. As a
learner, my main objective was to gain from my
teachers' insights.
During my first two years as a lecturer at NUS,
my teaching primarily focused on transferring
knowledge to students in my class effectively. Over
time, as I gained more confidence in teaching,
I adjusted my syllabi and lecture notes based
on my experiences and improved my teaching
methodology. Participating in teaching and
learning seminars/workshops organised by the
CDTL also helped to hone my teaching skills. In
addition, I strive to connect with all my students
to make their learning experiences enjoyable and
exciting, stimulate their interest in the subject,
and prepare them for solving difficult technical
problems. Over the years, I have designed and
taught numerous modules (from 1000- to 5000-
level) in the Division of Environmental Science and
Engineering at NUS. These modules are mostly
designed to teach students knowledge and skills
relevant to the industry (e.g. identifying costeffective
technological solutions to complex, multifaceted
environmental problems). I have also taken
the initiative to teach several key modules (e.g.
Environmental Technology, Air Pollution Control,
and Pollution Minimisation and Prevention) that
are closely linked with one another to provide
students with a broad-based education.
In this article, I will elaborate on why and how I
teach and highlight the learning outcomes achieved
as a result of my teaching methods.
Why I teach?
Education is important and effective teaching is
the key to helping students learn the knowledge
and skills they need to succeed in today's rapidly
changing world. Teaching is central to my
development as an academic. I enjoy working with
students in an academic environment thoroughly.
Like many dedicated educators, I find my job
challenging and immensely rewarding as I have opportunities to inspire, nurture and assist in
developing students as tomorrow's professionals.
I am very proud that many of my former students
have been well-placed in the industry.
How I teach
My primary objectives as an educator are to ensure
that students:
- Master concepts
- Gain skills
- Learn how to learn on their own
- Develop creativity in problem-solving
I firmly believe that students need to develop
healthy scientific skepticism, intellectual
curiosity, critical and independent thinking
skills. The teaching methods I adopt to achieve
my teaching objectives depends on who I am
teaching. Undergraduate students, part-time MSc
students, full-time MEng/PhD students all have
different needs, abilities and preferred modes
of communication. As each student tunes in at a
different frequency, I find it necessary to employ
various strategies to appeal to learners with
different learning styles (e.g. analytical, visual,
oral, active, passive, individual, cooperative). I
also include different kinds of assignments in
my modules to cater to students' strengths and
develop their critical thinking and problem-solving
skills.
For each class, I always prepare more material
than I can present, bearing in mind which of the
material must be presented and which is optional.
The dynamics of each class also determines how
the optional material will be employed. Students'
questions and facial expressions inform me what
issues to focus on, which ones to explore more in
depth, what examples to give and what stories to
tell. Another way I gauge students' understanding
of a topic is to ask them to respond to simple
questions (e.g. Should I go on? Do I need to go
over this again? Are we getting sleepy? Did this
example work or do I need to provide another?)
by nodding or shaking their heads. As I encourage
students to interact with one another and with me
in class, I believe that I have transformed myself
from the 'sage on the stage' to the 'guide on the
side'.
I make it a point to understand students' points
of view however erroneous, before attempting
to give my own. This means that when I teach,
I build on students' understanding of the subject
matter before I proceed to offer a broader or more
conventional explanation. Students in my classes
know how I teach and they have asked me to help
them with other subjects!
I design assessment tasks that encourage students
to consider situations using perspectives different
from those they normally adopt. This helps them in
their professional development. I also use a number
of case studies to illustrate practical applications
and implications of key concepts covered in the
subject matter. Student feedback suggests that
what students have learnt from my teaching
materials and case studies are useful beyond the
classroom.
Learning outcomes
Upon completing my modules, students will
have:
- The ability to apply science and engineering
concepts to solve environmental engineering
problems
- The ability to work together as a team
- The ability to communicate effectively
- An understanding of the impact of engineering
solutions in a global context and the role of
environmental engineers today
- Recognition of the need for lifelong learning
and the ability to engage in it
In summary, I design my teaching methods to meet students'
needs to ensure that they will be successful in their careers upon
graduation. To achieve the desired learning outcomes, I employ
a variety of teaching methods to help students from diverse
backgrounds learn the subject matter and its applications. I feel
that it is vital that educators treat their students with respect,
remembering what it is like to be on the other side of the desk.
As an educator, my ultimate satisfaction does not come from
students' applause or positive feedback, but rather, how students
have benefited from my course and my teaching.
|
|
|
Back to Top
|