| |
|
|
 |
Plagiarism
- Vol. 11 No. 2, May 2008 |
 |
Independent Learning
- Vol. 11 No. 1, Jan 2008 |
 |
Undergraduate Research
- Vol. 10 No. 1, Jan 2007 |
 |
Engaging Students
- Vol. 9 No. 2, Jul 2006 |
 |
Learner-centred Teaching/Learning
- Vol. 9 No. 1, Apr 2006 |
 |
Annual Teaching Excellence Award
- Vol. 10 No. 4, Sep 2007
- Vol. 10 No. 3, Aug 2007
- Vol. 9 No. 4, Sep 2006
- Vol. 9 No. 3, Aug 2006
- Vol. 8 No. 7, Oct 2005
- Vol. 8 No. 6, Sep 2005 |
 |
Lifelong Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 5, Aug 2005 |
 |
Balancing Theory and Practice
- Vol. 8 No. 4, Jul 2005 |
 |
Learning with Technology
- Vol. 8 No. 3, May 2005 |
 |
Reflective Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 2, Mar 2005 |
 |
Active Learning
- Vol. 8 No. 1, Jan 2005 |
 |
Balancing Teaching and Research
- Vol. 7 No. 7, Aug 2004 |
|
|
 |
Preparing for the First Lecture/Class
- Vol. 7 No. 6, Jul 2004 |
|
|
 |
Interactive Technology in Education
- Vol. 7 No. 5, May 2004 |
|
|
 |
Collaborative Learning
- Vol. 7 No. 4, Apr 2004 |
|
|
 |
Student Motivation/Teacher Motivation
- Vol. 7 No. 3, Mar 2004 |
|
|
 |
Discussion in the Classroom
- Vol. 7 No. 2, Feb 2004 |
|
|
 |
IT-supported Learning Strategies
- Vol. 6 No. 9, Sep 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 8, Aug 2003 |
|
|
 |
Heterogeneous Student Body
- Vol. 6 No. 7, Jul 2003 |
|
|
 |
Postgraduate Supervision
- Vol. 6 No. 6, Jun 2003 |
|
|
 |
PDP-T Research Projects
- Vol. 6 No. 5, May 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 10, Oct 2003
- Vol. 6 No. 11, Nov 2003 |
|
|
 |
Cultivating Leaders
- Vol. 6 No. 4, Apr 2003 |
|
|
 |
NUS Outstanding Educator Award
- Vol. 6 No. 2, Feb 2003
- Vol. 7 No. 8, Sep 2004
- Vol. 7 No. 9, Oct 2004 |
|
|
 |
Constructivism
- Vol. 6 No. 1, Jan 2003 |
|
|
 |
Continuing Education
- Vol. 5 No. 1, Mar 2002 |
|
|
 |
Cross-disciplinary Teaching
- Vol. 5 No. 2, Apr 2002
- Vol. 9 No. 5. Oct 2006 |
|
|
 |
Curriculum Design/Programme
- Vol. 4 No. 6, Dec 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 5, Oct 2000
- Vol. 2 No. 5, Nov 1999
- Vol. 1 No. 1, Apr 1998 |
|
|
 |
Demonstration-Based Teaching
- Vol. 4 No. 1, Feb 2001 |
|
|
 |
Discipline and Counselling
- Vol. 5 No. 5. Aug 2002 |
|
|
 |
Emotional Intelligence
- Vol. 2 No. 1, Mar 10, 1999 |
|
|
 |
IT in Education
- Vol. 10 No. 2, Apr 2007 - Vol. 5 No. 3, May 2002
- Vol. 4 No. 4, Oct 2001
- Vol. 4 No. 3, Aug 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 6, Nov 2000
- Vol. 2 No. 2, Mar 15, 1999
- Vol. 1 No. 2, Oct 1998 |
|
|
 |
Large-Group Teaching
- Vol. 4 No. 5, Nov 2001 |
|
|
 |
Learning Styles
- Vol. 5 No. 6, Sep 2002
- Vol. 5 No. 7, Oct 2002
- Vol. 7 No. 1, Jan 2004 |
|
|
 |
Problem-Based Learning
- Vol. 3 No. 3, Aug 2000 |
|
|
 |
Small-Group Teaching
- Vol. 2 No. 3, Apr 1999 |
|
|
 |
Spoon Feeding
- Vol. 3 No. 2, May 2000 |
|
|
 |
Student Assessment
- Vol. 2 No. 4, Aug 1999
- Vol. 6 No. 3, Mar 2003 |
|
|
 |
Student Management
- Vol. 4 No. 2, Apr 2001
- Vol. 3 No. 4, Sep 2000 |
|
|
 |
Teaching Evaluation
- Vol. 3 No. 1, Jan 2000 |
|
|
 |
Thinking Skills
- Vol. 5 No. 4, Jul 2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Cross-disciplinary
Teaching and Learning |
|
| |
|
| October 2006, Vol. 9, No. 5 |
Print-Ready |
| Religion as a Heuristic
Anchor: Studying the Various
Interdisciplinary Approaches |
Dr Julius Bautista
Visiting Fellow
Department of South East Asian Studies |
|
XD2101 "Approaches to the Study of Religion"
is a module that aims to introduce students to the
history of religious studies through a review of the
different ways religion has been understood and
defined. Students are introduced to important writers
associated with various disciplines in different
weeks, and students must reflect on why different
disciplines work in different ways.
My experience shows that most students enrolled
in this module have fairly well-formulated opinions
about religiosity, ranging from vehement faith to
strong skepticism. Many students know that they are
already 'part of' a religion, but few will have thought
about religion as an academic enterprise. The first
objective of XD2101, therefore, is to interrogate the
very conditions by which 'religion' itself has been
produced as a linguistic and discursive category in
the academe. This involves, for example, examining
the Judeo-Chr istian lineage of the term, and
discussing whether or not a faith such as Buddhism
or Hinduism can be situated within its discursive
parameters.
The second main objective is to give students a
straightforward introduction to the main features
of social sciences disciplines thorough the lens
of religion. The module is structured around a
discussion of five or six individual theorists of
religion, whose approaches to religion exemplify the
wider disciplinary methodologies they employ. For example, we discuss Emile Durkheim and Max Weber
according to their works on society and religion,
as well as Sigmund Freud and James Frazer for
psychology and anthropology respectively. Normally,
the theorists studied in the module are 'founding
fathers' of the discipline. It is an interesting part of
the module to demonstrate that many disciplines in
the social sciences, such as anthropology, philosophy
and sociology, were founded by theorists who
were very much concerned with religious topics.
The module, therefore, is by nature an
interdisciplinary one. In addition to this, it
is important to see the topic of religion as
a common 'anchor' by which various social
science methodologies can be compared with one
another. The functionalist approach to religion
by anthropologist Edward Tylor, for example, is
contrasted with a view of religion as a case of
universal neurosis, as exemplified by Sigmund
Freud, or the focus on religion as societal cohesion
exemplif ied by the work of sociologist Emile
Durkheim. The fundamental basis by which the
module is conceptualised is that 'religion' is an
effective heuristic by which students can learn
various disciplinary approaches and compare them
with one another.
The module is a cross-disciplinary (XD) course
that offers a foundation for the study of the
world's religions. In this respect, it complements GEK1045 "Introduction to World Religions", a
general knowledge (GEK) module taught in the
first semester. The general aim of both the GEK
and the XD modules (both foundational modules
for a minor in religious studies) is to foster an
academic environment in which students can learn
and exchange ideas about religion in a spirit that
is tolerant, open and lively. While the lectures
and tutorials provide a basic, straightforward
outline of each of the world's major faiths, the
minor is designed so that students' personal ideas
about religion can be brought to bear on current
scholarship and research on religion.
|
|
|
Back to Top
|