|
Singapore has done well through the years by adopting foreign technology
and providing political stability and a sound economy within which investors
can operate successfully. Our focus on quality education has produced
a workforce which is able to learn and apply foreign expertise quickly
and effectively. This formula for success, however, will not be sufficient
in the next phase of growth.
In less than four years' time, Singapore will enter the 21st Century
as a developed economy and will compete with other larger developed economies
in the first league. Moreover, it has been widely recognised that economic
competition fuelled by technological innovations will be much more intense
in the 21st Century. We will thus need to ensure that we have world-class
capabilities and quality human resources to survive and advance as a developed
economy. Singapore's competitiveness will depend more and more on its
ability to innovate (i.e., to develop higher value-added processes, better
quality products and services) continuously, in order to keep ahead of
strong competitors.
What are the major implications of the above changes in the 21st Century
for postsecondary education in Singapore? This is a topic of great interest
today as you are working upstream of the whole education process. You
will naturally want to know the possible future scenarios so that you
can examine the necessary changes in schools in order to better prepare
the students for their next stage of education.
I shall focus on the implications for university education but these
should have general applicability. After a quick survey of the changes
in skills and competencies that graduates should have in the 21st Century,
I shall discuss what corresponding changes should be made to the teaching
and assessment methods at the university in order to ensure that the requisite
learning objectives are achieved. This will include the appropriate and
innovative use of information technology to enhance learning. Next, I
shall discuss the often neglected but essential role of the non-academic
aspects of university education, in particular their contribution to developing
the students' emotional intelligence. I shall end by stating my view on
the need for formal training of all academic staff and briefly relating
what I have discussed to the development of entrepreneurial qualities.
I. Changing Skills and Competencies
When knowledge and technology can be easily imported, the primary concerns
of the workforce are rapid implementation and adaptation. Reduction to
practice, technology transfer and problem-solving involve know-what and
know-how skills which for the most part use logical reasoning and analytical
thinking.
Creative problem solving. There is
little need for originality,creativity or innovative thinking except for
a small number of senior managers and leaders who are in charge of overall
policy, planning and strategy selection. This scenario will change rapidly.
To prosper in the 21st Century as a small country and compete with the
top tier of developed countries, Singapore needs to have exceptional performance.
As reminded recently by our Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (when
he gave the opening speech on 28 May '96 to launch the NUS's Annual Literacy
Encounter Programme), creativity can no longer be confined to a small
elite group of Singaporeans. The whole workforce needs creative problem-solving
skills and they cannot just follow their leaders without thinking and
understanding. He stressed that we need a sound educational system which
stretches our students' creative potential. For university students, it
is therefore essential that they be equipped with higher-order thinking
abilities, which include analytical, creative and systems thinking, in
order to function more effectively in the workplace of the 21st Century.
Teamworking and networking. To achieve
exceptional performance, Singapore also needs to mobilise and harness
the strength of teamwork and network. Individuals must be equipped with
interpersonal and teamworking skills. Teamworking is especially important
for high-tech economic competition as success there requires specialists
from the different disciplines of science, engineering, marketing, sales,
finance and others to work as a cohesive team. A modern concurrent engineering
approach to reduce time-to-market and thus gain competitive advantage
requires even more intimate working relationships and trust among many
people.
Even in non-high-tech organisations of the future, the use of information
technology will be so pervasive that organi-sational structure will be
flattened and workers will be empowered to form ad hoc teams to solve
problems with little supervision. Networking provides extra resources
for mutual collaboration within the organisation and the global village.
If Singapore can truly take advantage of global resources capital, materials
and knowledge the natural limitations of a small nation can be minimised.
Finally, team and network effectiveness would be enhanced if the members
possess shared values and a strong sense of social responsibility in addition
to social skills. University education should continue to build on the
foundation which has been laid by schools and contribute towards all these
aspects of non-academic development.
Information technology and lifelong learning.
The advances in information technology (IT) have accelerated the arrival
of the information age in which the rate of knowledge generation is exponential
and the life cycle of information will continually shrink. With easy access
to abundant information, a proactive mindset and competencies to seek,
process and apply relevant information will take precedence over the actual
knowledge content.
Knowledge workers (especially scientists and engineers)of the 21st Century
are also expected to retool themselves every three to five years. It is
thus essential that they receive an education which provides a broad,
multidisciplinary foundation for lifelong learning. At the extreme, knowledge
workers will be using IT tools to acquire just-in-time specific knowledge,
and they will need to acquire the discipline to set aside time for learning
every day.
II. Implications for Teaching and Assessment
While changes in the 21st Century will be rapid and drastic, the time
taken to equip our graduates with the desired skills and competencies
cannot be shortened significantly. It therefore behoves educators to anticipate
these changes as early as possible and proactively change the present
methods of university teaching and assessment to ensure that the requisite
learning objectives are achieved.
Teaching learning skills. The acquisition
of knowledge is no longer the most important objective of university education.
The acquisition of process skills, i.e. learning how to learn, is equally
important, if not more important, than the acquisition of knowledge itself.
Process skills refer to the abilities to source, analyse, screen, prioritize
and apply a mass of information to solve the problem at hand. Such skills
are especially important in the new era where the growth of knowledge
is explosive and lifelong independent learning is essential. The academic
staff should realise that the learning of process skills is more time-consuming,
and hence they need to make suitable adjustments to the subject syllabus
in order that the students are not overloaded.
Another more important consequence is that the teaching method should
shift in emphasis from passive lecturing to mentoring and small group
tutorials. Academic staff mentors who are active researchers would be
ideal persons to inspire the students to develop strong interests in learning
and guide them in exploring alternative ways of approaching a new topic
or resolving an open-ended problem. Small group tutorials would also enable
students to participate more actively in group discussions and further
develop their listening and speaking skills.
With the help of multimedia and advanced communication technology, it
may also be feasible to supplement face-to-face tutorials with interactive
tutorials in cyberspace,Consultation with academic staff virtually any
time and anywhere, and cooperative learning among students, may be facilitated
thanks to the advances in IT tools. Academic staff can decide on the appropriate
balance between more costly face-to-face sessions and less personal IT
tools depending on the specific overall learning experience of the individual
student and whether the subject is a core requirement or an option. (Note
that I have used the term "academic staff" instead of "lecturers"
as the latter may become a misleading term in the 21st Century!)
Teaching creative thinking. Our educators
need to take up the challenge of developing the creative thinking abilities
of students. The present method of teaching focuses on developing the
analytical thinking abilities. Students are educated to think in a convergent
manner and to arrive at unique answers to closed-ended simplified problems,
particularly in the science and engineering disciplines. Real-world problems
that need creative thinking are usually complex, not well understood,
and tend to have more than one appropriate answer.
Creative thinking skills can be developed by exposing students to the
process of creative thinking by conducting workshops designed for them
to practise idea generation, synthetic though and other forms of creative
thinking and by integrating the teaching of creative thinking skills into
the subject areas. It is, however, important to realise that the higher
order thinking skills to be further developed in university education
include both analytical and creative thinking skills and the latter does
not displace/replace the former. Indeed, as Dr. Edward De Bono, a world
renowned authority on the subject of creativity has estimated, creative
thinking may be used only five percent of the time in practice. Creative
thinking is especially important in formulating problems and exploring
alternative methods. Final decision-making, based on the evaluation of
alternatives and the detailing of action plans for implementation, will
require analytical thinking, and this will occupy the other 95% of the
time.
Incorporation of creative elements in course contents requires academic
staff to reformulate the problems so as to give students an opportunity
to exercise their creative thinking skills and to encourage the adoption
of an "open mind" attitude during the process of learning the
knowledge contents. Exercises in problem formulation and visualisation,
as well as learning through discovery, are additional methods the academic
staff can explore. Fortunately, advances in artificial intelligence and
cognitive psychology have also given us many creativity tools which may
be used to facilitate and enhance learning.
Alternative assessment methods. Assessment
methods will also need to be reviewed with the shift in teaching emphasis
and in the incorporation of creativity in education. One major obstacle
to the acquisition of process skills is the habit of rote learning which
does not promote engagement with and real mastering of what is being learnt.
As a result the students tend to lose interest early.
To move students away from rote learning, the use of alternative assessment
methods, such as the open-book examination which lends itself to testing
the students' process skills in problem-solving, should be increased.
Examination questions should also be less predictable to discourage reliance
on practising past-years' papers and on recall capabilities. Open-ended
problems along with open-book examinations are better suited to assess
the students' creative thinking abilities to solve non-structured and
non-routine problems. These will supplement conventional methods for testing
a stu-dent's ability in analysing and solving structured problems. Individual
oral presentations and participation in tutorial discussions should be
graded and given sufficient weightage to encourage the development of
good communication skills. To encourage the development of teamworking
skills, bonus marks may be awarded for good teamwork or outstanding team
performance.
The increasing use of IT tools for interactive tutorials and independent
project work provides another means of assessing students' progress and
achievement. In a brainstorming exercise, for instance, the creative thinking
skills of a student can be assessed by the number and quality of the alternative
ideas proposed. These can be easily tracked using computer software.
Broad-based knowledge. I would like
to mention two other important considerations. Owing to the time constraint,
I shall be brief. One is the need to emphasise a broad-based multidisciplinary
knowledge foundation for the 21st Century, even at the expense of some
specialised knowledge. I shall just quote one example for your reflection.
I have learnt that M.I.T. has recently required all first-year students
(science, engineering, social science, etc.) to take a course on biology.
Contrast this with the local situation where "A" level students
other than those in the medical stream do not study biology, and even
some "0" level students are allowed to drop biology! Such an
early specialisation will constrain unduly the development of a flexible
and adaptive workforce when the economic environment and opportunities
undergo major changes.
Systems thinking. The other important
consideration is the need to teach "systems thinking" as an
important component of higher order thinking skills to deal with complex
real-life problems. A relevant and familiar example is the following.
All teachers want to do their job well and give a great deal of homework
to the students. The teachers may be satisfied when the students return
good grades. At the systems level, however, we may find that this is poor
education if the students, being over-pressured, cannot find time to develop
social and other necessary nonacademic skills. A worse consequence may
be that the students' interests in learning are "killed" in
the process! Teachers who are familiar with systems thinking should be
able to identify these possible pitfalls and thus plan accordingly. Experts
now believe that the elements of systems thinking should be taught even
in primary schools!
III. Implications for Non-Academic Developments
Emotional intelligence. While innovations
in teaching and assessment methods will improve the students' intellectual
and technical capabilities, a sustainable outstanding performance in the
workplace of the 21st Century will require that individual team members
possess what the experts call "emotional intelligence" (measured
by emotional intelligence quotient, or E.Q. in short). Emotional intelligence
includes self-awareness and impulse control, persistence, zeal and self-motivation,
empathy, and social deftness. It determines how effectively individuals
perform in groups and complements traditional roles of rationa] intelligence
(measured by intelligence quotient, or I.Q. in short). Outstanding organisations
of the 21st Century need "star" performers who possess both
high I.Q. and E.Q., in addition to strong teams of knowledge workers.
Let me elaborate on the quality of "star" performers. The world
renowned Bell Laboratories in the USA attracts scientists and engineers
who are all at the top on academic I.Q. tests. But within this pool of
talent, some emerge as stars, while others remain average in their output.
What makes the difference between stars and others is not their I.Q.s,
but their E.Q.s. Star performer are better able to motivate themselves
and work their informal networks into ad hoc but winning teams. The "stars"
were studied in one division of the Labs, whose sophisticated work required
teams ranging from 5 to 150 scientists and engineers. No single person
knew enough to do the job alone; getting things done demanded tapping
other people's expertise. The study report, published in Harvard Business
Review, clearly indicated that a middle performer often had difficulty
getting the ad hoc team to solve an unanticipated problem; he painstakingly
called various technical gurus and then waited, wasting valuable time
while calls went unreturned and email messages unanswered. Star performers,
on the other hand, rarely faced such situations because they did the work
of building reliable networks long before they actually need them. When
they called someone for advice, stars almost always got a faster answer.
Besides networking, star performers also excel in other aspects of emotional
intelligence. These include effective coordination, expertise in building
consensus, ability to see things from the perspectives of others, persuasiveness,
ability to promote cooperation, and a high level of initiative. Incidentally,
I believe that the presence of such star performers can help us solve
one important problem in Singapore that of job hopping. If we have star
performers leading and building strong teams of knowledge workers of the
future, the team members will find it more difficult emotionally to job
hop for small gains elsewhere!
The challenge. In view of the importance
of emotional intelligence in enabling effective teamwork and creating
star performers in organisations of the future, the development of the
basic skills of emotional intelligence should become an essential and
explicit goal of university education, and academic staff must take up
this challenge. The basics of emotional intelligence can be taught both
in schools and in universities. Awareness and skills can be improved through
special workshops conducted by experts.
However, we should realise that emotional intelligence cannot be fully
developed and improved in the classroom alone. As in primary and secondary
schools, non-academic aspects of university education provide better and
more varied opportunities for personal growth,reinforcing societal values
and responsibilities. Networking and teamworking are other components
of emotional intelligence which can be more effectively enhanced through
team sports, clubs, committee assignments and other extracurricular activities.
I would venture to add that certain qualities such as determination, enthusiasm
and passion which are strengthened in non-academic pursuits are also important
in academic performance especially in research and scholarship.
Our academic staff should be urged to apply systems thinking themselves
to fully understand that educational objectives incorporate both academic
and non-academic aspects. As nonacademic performance is difficult to assess
and hence not graded, students have the tendency to focus their attention
only on the academic aspects in order to score good grades. To optimise
the entire educational experience, academic staff therefore need to play
a critical role in guiding the students to pursue a more balanced educational
experience for long-term benefits. I would like to further suggest that
our academic staff apply the principle of concurrent engineering to the
educational process/products this will convince them to move upstream
to work in partnership with schools to achieve synergy.
Finally, staff should have the shared vision to build a campus culture
that makes the university a caring community, a place where students feel
respected and cared about, and experience bonding with classmates, academic
staff and the university itself. Academic staff need to be role models
and extend their care to and influence over the students. The university
will then be well regarded as an outstanding national resource to serve
the function of nurturing and strengthening both the academic and emotional
intelligence of our students.
IV. Concluding Remarks
Formal staff training. All the necessary
changes discussed above cannot be carried out effectively if academic
staff are not well prepared to face the new challenges. To overcome resistance
and instil enthusiasm, formal staff training in the fresh approaches to
teaching, assessment and learning will be essential. The skills and attitude
of staff in contributing to the non-academic aspects of education need
special attention as staff performance in this area is hardest to track.
University management will need to review the staff appraisal system to
ensure that it rewards academic staff who have successfully negotiated
the paradigm shift.
University staff will be encouraged to share their experience with our
school-teachers, alert them of future changes, and provide feedback to
help schools be more effective. I hope my presentation today also communicates
the message that the University appreciates the critical role played by
schools and the cooperation should be further strengthened by more regular
dialogue sessions.
Cultivating entrepreneurship. I have
not touched directly on the interesting and important question of how
we could nurture entrepreneurship. More of our graduates will become entrepreneurs
as opportunities for new business ventures are created by the rapid technological
revolution and the economic development in other parts of Asia. It is
also recognised that the competitive advantage of a nation is significantly
enhanced if the workforce and the leaders have entrepreneurial spirit
and qualities.
It suffices to mention here that the nurturing of higher order thinking
skills and the development of emotional intelligence all help potential
entrepreneurs who will need these competencies to create new ventures
and persevere in the face of ever-increasing competition. A person strong
in emotional intelligence is unlikely to develop the "risk-averse
(or kiasu)" attitude which would lead to negative consequences such
as "unwilling[ness] to make a decision" or "not giving
the new method a chance to be tried out".
It is also well-known that entrepreneurs are experts in networking. In
this respect, the university will have another good reason to significantly
increase the number of foreign students or provide more opportunities
for local students to study abroad through exchange programmes. The friendship
and the global networks thus developed will be very helpful to future
generations of university graduates who subsequently become entrepreneurs
and leaders.
I have focused on university education in my presentation. I believe,
however, that much of what I have said is equally important to other post-secondary
educational institutions which aspire to be learning organisations of
the future. Let us all work towards producing learning environments which
are exciting and creative for our students, equipping them to face the
challenges of the 21st Century.
|