|
Introduction
Shaffer & Anundsen (1993) talk about the eternal human yearning
for kinship, community, and connection to a greater purpose, which has
taken on a very different dimension in the age of Internet. Today, communities
are formed around issues of identity and shared values (Pallof & Pratt,
1999), rather than spatial considerations (Pallof & Pratt, 1996).
A community may be defined as a dynamic group of people who see themselves
as part of a bigger whole with some shared purpose, exchange ideas, take
some shared and joint decisions and, for the purpose of the shared goals,
are interdependent. With the advent of electronic communication and cyberspace,
the use of online communication tools in higher edu-cation is increasing
rapidly (Funaro, 1999) such that this feeling of ‘community’
is being realised in a specific manner particularly in the field of distance
education. Based on my experience of creating university modules and online
distance learning courses, this paper looks at how the use of electronic
bulletin boards is redefining the way learners commu-nicate and take the
stewardship of the learning environment.
Computer-mediation in Community Building
Building of learner communities in cyberspace is usually driven by the
requirements of the learning pro-gramme. The success of any online learning
environment depends not only on the provision of two-way communication
between teacher and the learners (The California Distance Learning Project
website, 1997), but also the interaction among students themselves, as
such collaboration develops a sense of belonging to the common cause of
knowledge enhancement (Palloff & Pratt, 1999: 5). In a typical learning
environment, the students are expected to explore the content collaboratively
and interact among themselves. But due to the absence of face-to-face
interaction in distance learning, a computer-mediated vehicle for online
discussion becomes a necessary backbone of the learning package. The advantages
of an online electronic discussion via a bulletin board over a face-to-face
session are many:
- Shy students, who are reluctant to engage in face-to-face discussions,
can participate without feeling dominated by the more vocal members
of the learning community.
- The asynchronous nature of a bulletin board discussion allows reflection
and more in-depth reaction to an issue than impromptu responses in a
classroom situation.
- The not-so-initiated can delay their responses, unlike face-to-face
classroom situations that demand instantaneous responses from the learners
and may alienate shy students.
Uses of Online Bulletin Boards
Whether for an online or a regular campus-based course, I think that
electronic bulletin boards can enhance the learning experience and com-plement
the other educational activities within the course. I have been using
bulletin boards, employing both free services (Voyforum.com, and Network54.com)
as well as the Nanyang Technological Uni-versity’s subscribed forum
(Blackboard.Inc.) for sometime in the following manner:
- Summaries of readings: Students need to post their reading summaries
on a weekly basis. Summaries are not graded. But since these are posted
publicly, students are more prompt and responsible. It also allows students
to learn from others’ work.
- Student-led discussions: Students are asked to post and lead discussion
topics. This extends communication time, is learner-oriented, teaches
students how to pose good questions, and sets them thinking.
- Peer learning: As the students’ own space, the bulletin board
encourages student exchanges. It helps them to handle difficult topics
and negotiate difficult concepts, thus facilitating a kind of collaborative
learning not possible in a regular classroom situation.
- Communication anytime, any-where: As an asynchronous discussion platform,
the bulletin board allows students to post prepared responses, as opposed
to ‘on the fly’ responses in class. This is pedagogically
sounder and has greater impact on the learning process.
- Allows the instructor to see the student weaknesses like never before:
By monitoring bulletin board discussions, instructors can catch misconceptions
and gauge students’ level of understanding on a particular topic.
(see Fig. 1 )
- Generates tutorial topics: Tutorial topics are decided based on the
ongoing discussions, thereby facilitating student-centred learning.
(see Fig. 2 )
|
Date Posted: 16:45:51 08/24/99 Tue
Author: chenyee
Subject: Re: (XSS229/3A)/Drainage Basin
In reply to: sharon tan’s message, “Re:
(XSS229/3A)/Drainage Basin” on 16:45:51
08/24/99 Tue
> ok…hi everyone…
> i have a question
> Dr Chatterjea, in your lecture on drainage basin,
> you mentioned that areas with resistant rocks have
> widely spaced streams and very few as well, why is
> this so?
resistant rocks refer to rocks with fewer lines of weaknesses,
more resistant to weathering and lower porosity. therefore the water
that flows over a plane of more resistant rock will take a greater
effort to etch out channel to develop into a river.
vice-versa, weaker rocks are more easily carved out by erosional
action of water. thus within a unit area of land, the one with weaker
rocks are more susceptible and thus has a higher drainage network
density.
am i right?
[Next Thread Previous Thread Next Message Previous
Message]
|
Fig. 1: In response to classmate Sharon
Tan’s question, Chen Yee replies,
but also asks for confirmation from the lecturer, creating a web of guided
peer-learning where the instructor can keep track of students’ understanding.
Date Posted: 18:40:16 09/04/00 Mon
Author: Jeryl Sim
Subject: Re: Streamflow matters
In reply to: Dr. Chatterjea’s message,
“Streamflow matters” on
18:40:16 09/04/00 Mon
> Look out for discussion questions on this topic. You
> may start your own – any doubts, queries,
> observations etc.
Dr Kalyani,
The tutorial question you’d given us, the part abt finding
manning’s ration is alittle problematic. I have difficulty
finding the wetted perimeter, itz not given. In the end i’d
assumed wide channel to avoid using the A/P equation for the R.
Guess maybe you could go through the tutorial with us again before
the exam?
[Next Thread Previous Thread Next Message Previous
Message]
Follow-ups to this message:
· Re: Streamflow matters – Dr. Chatterjea, 02:23:41
09/15/00 Fri |
Fig. 2: Student generates tutorials,
and thus, exerts control over the learning environment.
Making Effective Bulletin Board Discussions
At present, the concept of cyber-communities and online learning is
still catching on. However, novelty wears off fast—it is easy to
lose contact in an online, distance-learning environment unless interest
levels are maintained. To sustain the effectiveness of electronic bulletin
boards and build learning cyber-communities, I have tried the following:
- The bulletin board activities are fully integrated within the course,
although additional spaces are created as and when it is necessary.
- Students are assigned specific tasks and schedules.
- Forum topics are related to specific lecture and lab assignments.
- Regular references are made to bulletin board discussions during
lectures. This persuades even the most reluctant student to participate
in the online learning activities.
- If students are lost during posting of discussion topics, help is
provided. Regular checks are also made to monitor the lines of discussion
and bring wayward discussions back on track.
- Regularity is essential for the sustenance of the environment. Consequently,
bulletin board activities need to be kept ongoing.
- Take it seriously. Students will then show interest too.
In my experience, once students are initiated to such an environment,
they make very good use of this platform. But to keep a bulletin board
in its most effective dynamic state, it must be stressed that the instructor
has to provide many hours of regular online support. This can escalate
the workload, which cannot be reflected under most systems of staff appraisal.
Conclusion
As social communication is essential for learning, electronic bulletin
boards provide an excellent platform for the creation of learning communities
for students of both on-campus and distance-learning courses. An online
community cannot be created or sustained by one person. But once the instructor
initiates it, careful planning and regular maintenance can extend and
enhance the learning environment. In my view, electronic bulletin boards
far outshine the capabilities of face-to-face discussion sessions, which
may be limited by predetermined personal characteristics or even by spatial
and temporal constraints. Being almost free from personal bias, and also
being available anytime, anywhere, seem to be big points in favour of
this computer-mediated community development.
Bibliography
California Distance Learning Project. ‘What is Distance Education?’.
1997. http://www.otan.dni.us/cdlp/distance/whatis.html.
(30 June 2000).
Funaro, G.M. ‘Pedagogical Roles and Implementation Guidelines
for Online Communication Tools’. ALN Magazine. Vol. 3, Issue 2,
December 1999. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/magazine/Vol3_issue2/funaro.htm.
(30 June 2000).
Pallof, R. & Pratt, K. ‘Playing in the Cyberspace Sandbox:
The Intersection of the Human and the Electronic Communities’.
Paper presented virtually at the Cybermind Conference, Perth, Australia,
November 1996. http://www.curtin.edu.au/conference/cybermind/papers/index.
html. (30 June 2000).
Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.
Shaffer, C. & Anundsen, K. Creating Community Anywhere.
New York: Perigree Books, 1993.
|