|
Most courses come with a reading list that includes journal articles
recommended by your lecturer. This article aims to help you understand
how to approach journal articles and get the most out of them.
Are all journal articles the same?
No. Journal articles differ in purpose and format.
Knowing which type of journal article you are going to read will
enable you to predict its content, and thus facilitate your comprehension.
For your university studies, the following types of journal articles
are most relevant:
- Research reports
- Purpose: To give first-hand accounts of original research
- Format: Usually structured in well-defined sections, e.g.:
- Abstract: A brief summary highlighting rationale, methods
and findings
- Introduction: A brief review covering the theoretical
background and earlier research on the topic, and giving
reasons for the current research
- Method: Details on how the research was conducted and
what materials were used
- Results: Details on findings and statistical tests,
with summaries of data in the form of charts/graphs/tables
- Discussion (sometimes embedded in Results section):
Analysis, interpretations and implications of results
- Conclusion (sometimes embedded in Discussion section):
Summary of key findings and suggestions of future directions
for further research
- Literature reviews
- Purpose: To analyse and consolidate the findings of other
authors so as to give a more critical and cohesive view of
a topic
- Format: Focus on analysis of theories through:
- Overview of information from previous publications
- Identification of relationships/inconsis-tencies/contradictions/gaps
in current knowledge
- Recommendations and suggestions for future work
- Theoretical reviews
- Purpose: To present new theories or challenge existing ones
- Format: Similar to literature reviews whereby authors usually
trace a theory’s development, and then expand on it,
postulating their own refinements
How should I approach a journal article?
- Get some background knowledge on the topic first. Refer to
your textbooks, as journal writers generally assume that you know
the basics, and will be liberal in their use of terminology.
- Read for the author’s meaning. At this point, you are
not looking for more information on the topic, but are focusing
on the way in which it is being thought about. You can do this
by:
- Reading carefully to understand the author’s meaning.
Ensure that you have understood what the author wants to say,
and not what you think the author wants to say. Having defined
the purpose of the article, draw up a brief outline of its
contents to help you follow the writer’s flow of thought
without getting sidetracked by too much detail.
- Asking questions, e.g.:
- What is the author’s theoretical basis?
- What new aspect is being added to what is already known?
- Especially for research reports: What is/are the author’s
argument(s) in relation to supporting/rejecting the hypotheses?
Approached in this way, reading journal articles will reinforce
your knowledge of, and develop your thinking about, the topic, by
finding out what other people have to say and keeping up with latest
developments in the research.
|
|
References
Department of Psychology, Academic Technologies for Learning,
and University of Alberta. (1997). Reading Reports of Empirical
Studies. [Online].
http://www.utoronto.ca/writing/critrdg.html
(last accessed: 7 April 2003).
Knott, D. (2001). Critical Reading Towards Critical Writing.
New College Writing Centre. [Online]. http://www.criticalreading.com/criticalreadingthinkingtoc.htm
(last accessed: 7 April 2003).
Kurland, D.J. (2000). How the Language Really Works: The Fundamentals
of Critical Reading and Effective Writing. [Online]. http://www.artsci.gmcc.ab.ca/courses/psyc208/Reading/Reading.htm
(last accessed: 7 April 2003).
Unilearning: Self-access Resources, University of Wollongong.
(2000). How to Read Critically. [Online]. http://unilearning.uow.edu.au/reading/2a.html
(last accessed: 7 April 2003).
|